Annotations spreadsheet (changes made in this session); ctrl-A, copy & paste in notepad to save at end of session, 

208,  beach2,       lexical_variations:, 1, 4, 2,  Comments:, Liz's crvd-B>B Naomi's A>B-L variations on the same basic sign - complicated because the B/B-L relationship is probably allophonic but the starting handshapes (A/crvd-B) stem from different descriptors (gut-feeling - rocks vs. swimming) Tyler's BEACH is a different sign all together ( a synonym) - though the B handshapes in all cases here are referring to a flat surface the way the hands interact make them clearly separate signs (also, possib;y in Tyler S sign - borrowing from English) Joan - Review; change once ability to distinguish between starting & ending hs available Not sure
209,  beans,       lexical_variations:, 1, 4, 1,  Comments:, BEANS- synonyms - no relationship Done
210,  bear,        Comments:, All same sign Done
211,  beard,        Comments:, BEARD variations of the same sign - slight differences in handshapes hard to tell if transcription error or allophonic variables - either or both make sense None of these handshapes were 5-C-tt as marked; therefore, all were changed to 5-C. Done
212,  beat_abuse,        Comments:, BEAT-ABUSE - same sign/ Liz may be using 10 handshape instead of A - this is exactly the environment where one would expect free variation of 10/A/S Done; Allophones
213,  beat_hit-fr,        Comments:, BEAT-HIT - ditto Done
214,  beautiful,        Comments:, BEAUTIFUL - overlooked in Liz's annotation is her handshape change to flat-O in the middle of the sign - she adds an optional flourish which is why her sign "ends with 5" but in fact the sequence is crvd-5>flat-O>5. All three re doing the same sign but 5 is in no way an allophone of flat-O Joan - Review
215,  because1,        Comments:, NOTE: Instance where the sign is the same across the board but Liz is ending in a different handshape. To be marked when Morpheme options expand. Done allophones - ending handshape
217,  become_fat,        Comments:, NOTE: Instance where the sign is the same across the board but Liz is ending in a different handshape. To be marked when Morpheme options expand. Done; allophones - beginning hs
218,  bed,       lexical_variations:, 1, 1, 1,  Comments:, BED - all variants of the same sign - (1 h v. 2 h) Review from different angle
220,  bee,       lexical_variations:, 1, 1, 1,  Comments:, BEE - couldn't get the video to play but it looks like Liz starts the sign just like the others - with F (not curved-B) Liz begins the sign with the same handshape but ends in a different handshape with a very different palm orientation. Done; allophones - ending hs
221,  beer,        Comments:, BEER - I don't see how the difference in B v. B-xd here - all the same sign Agreed. This is all the same sign with no variation. Done
223,  before2-fr,        Comments:, BEFORE - Liz and Naomi are doing the same sign, Tyler is signing a different sign that also means 'before' but in a slightly different way? Not sure Tyler's sign belongs in this set. Has a different connotation than the other 'before'. Regardless, it is a separate sign. Liz and Naomi are both doing the same sign, and it's important to note that the handshape given here is only that of the dominant hand. In both, the non-dominant handshape is B-L. Done
224,  beg-fr,        Comments:, All one sign. Naomi's handshape lacked the necessary intensity to be called a 5-C-tt. Done
226,  behavior-n1,        Comments:, BEHAVIOR - same sign/close judgment calls on handshapes Done
227,  behavior-n2,       lexical_variations:, 1, 1, 4,  Comments:, BEHAVIOR 2 - Naomi is signing a different signs (to perform an action) and the other 2 are signing the sign above Done; allophones - start & end hs
229,  beijing,       lexical_variations:, 1, 1, 1,  Comments:, BEIJING - same sign Handshape variant - determination of version 1 vs version 2 was arbitrary. Done; allophones - start & end hs
234,  bell,        Comments:, BELL - Tyler and Naomi are signing the same sign (what I call ALARM) and Liz is signing "handbell". Done
235,  belong1,        Comments:, BELONG - different signs all together. This set should no longer exist.
236,  belong2,        Comments:, BELONG 2- Liz and Naomi same sign. These linking signs are a place where one sees 8 and F in free variation. Tyler is signing a different sign which is, I guess, synonymous (but not in my ideolect.) Done
238,  below1,       lexical_variations:, 1, 1, 1,  Comments:, BELOW - same sign Done; allophones - start & end hs
239,  below2,       lexical_variations:, 1, 1, 1,  Comments:, BELOW 2- same sign Done; allophones - one set on start hs, another set on end hs
244,  bet,        Comments:, BET - same sign Done
246,  between2,        Comments:, BETWEEN - same sign Naomi's handshapes are incorrectly annotated Done
247,  beyond-fr,        Comments:, BEYOND - Liz and Naomi same sign, Tyler different sign (?) there are a number of signs where one can use B-L or 10 - I think there's a slight difference in meaning/usage, though. Liz's handshape should be annotated 10 not A. Done
249,  bicycle-fr,        Comments:, BICYCLE looks like Naomi has S handshapes too just like L and T? Yes, she does done
250,  big,        Comments:, BIG - same sign Done
251,  bikini,       lexical_variations:, 1, 1, 1,  Comments:, Review - ask Joan about conscious choice for size
254,  biology,        Comments:, BIOLOGY - same sign. Handshapes all look the same too. Done
255,  bird,        Comments:, BIRD - same sign. Mistake annotating Naomi's end handshape should be flat-G. Start handshape L v. G is a matter of degree (how noisy is this bird?) Review - again, since it is a matter of degree (like bikini) does that change whether it's an allophonic variation or not?
259,  bison,       lexical_variations:, 1, 1, 1,  Comments:, Adjusted Liz's starting handshape from a C to a crvd-5. Done; allophones - start hs
260,  bite,       lexical_variations:, 1, 1, 1,  Comments:, BITE - same sign Done; allophones - start hs; even though Tyler's start hs is marked as a crvd-5, the basic sign is a C since you would not go from a 5 to a flat-C.
264,  blanket-n,       lexical_variations:, 1, 1, 1,  dominantHS:,  0, 0, 0, 0, 23, 23,  Comments:, BLANKET - judgment calls on handshapes? Done; allophones - start & end hs; all three allophones
265,  blanket-v,       lexical_variations:, 1, 4, 1,  Comments:, BLANKET-v - 2 different signs Review - I think that, in this case, the flat-O and bent-B are allophones because it's really just a matter of thumb placement that distinguishes them; however, they probably won't universally be allophones
266,  blank-out,        Comments:, BLANK-OUT - Liz and Naomi using different sign than Tyler (same loc and mvmt, though) Done
271,  blinds2,       lexical_variations:, 1, 1, 1,  Comments:, BLINDS - same sign Done; allophones; one set of allophones start hs, another set of allophones end hs; starting set matter of curve, ending set matter of thumb placement
272,  blink,        Comments:, Corrected Naomi's ending handshape to L. All one sign. Done
273,  block,        Comments:, BLOCK - Liz and Tyler same sign - Naomi uses the sign BOX/ROOM Since they are different signs, does Naomi's sign belong in this set? Review - Proper set?
277,  blood,        Comments:, Review - Naomi's sign marked as a compound, but Liz is doing what appears to be the same transition & hers is not marked as a compound.
278,  blossom,        dominantHS:,  51, 0, 0, 0, 0, 35,  Comments:, BLOSSOM - all same sign hard call on handshapes Done; allophones; one set start hs, another set end hs; starting set a matter of thumb placement, end set a matter of curvature
279,  blouse,        Comments:, BLOUSE - dif sign (Tyler signs DRESS) - should no longer be a set
280,  blow_nose,        dominantHS:,  59, 59, 59, 59, 59, 59,  Comments:, BLOW-NOSE same sign wrong hs in all cases Review - Joan, this the correct hs?
282,  blow_up1,        dominantHS:,  0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 35,  Comments:, BLOW UP fine Done; allophones; one set in start hs, one set of three in end hs
285,  blush,        Comments:, Because two of three a compound sign, not a valid set.
286,  boat,        dominantHS:,  18, 18, 0, 0, 0, 0,  Comments:, BOAT fine except maybe Liz's thumbs? Done
288,  boil,        dominantHS:,  0, 0, 35, 35, 35, 35,  Comments:, BOIL judgment of hs? I think they are all inbetween; Agreed. Because all have some bend in the knuckles, I labeled them all as crvd-5 Done
289,  boiling_mad,        Comments:, BOILING MAD I think Naomi is using a 5 hand also. We need to think about what wiggling does to the perception of hs.
291,  bomb1,        Comments:, Review - Intensity of Naomi's crvd-5 hs. crvd-5-tt??
296,  born1,       lexical_variations:, 1, 1, 2,  dominantHS:,  0, 0, 20, 20, 0, 0,  Comments:, Done; same sign but S and B are not allophones
300,  boss2,        dominantHS:,  0, 0, 5, 5, 0, 0,  Comments:, BOSS fine
302,  both,        Comments:, Done; allophones - end hs
305,  bounce,        Comments:, BOUNCE fine Done; allophones - start & end hs; matter of finger spread
306,  bowling,        Comments:, BOWLING Liz is curved 3 but I don't think we have that hs.. The 5/3substitution is interesting - I think it only occurs in handling contexts? in nouns it makes substantial changes in meaning
307,  bowtie2,        Comments:, BOWTIE2 synonyms not the same sign
313,  bra,        Comments:, BRA fine
314,  bracelet1,        Comments:, BRACELET fine (another 8/F pair)
316,  brain,        Comments:, BRAIN-error in Tyler's - they are all the same - X
317,  brake2,        Comments:, BRAKE2 - Tyler's hs looks like S to me. Otherwise this is correct.
318,  branch_fork_in_road,        Comments:, BRANCH FORK IN ROAD Liz is using the 1 hs (transcription error) otherwise ok
320,  brawl_big_fight,        Comments:, BRAWL -ok
325,  break2,        Comments:, BREAK2 inconsistent transcription
326,  breakdown1,        Comments:, BREAKDOWN 1 fine
329,  breasts,        Comments:, BREASTS same sign all hs wrong
333,  broke,        Comments:, BROKE all same sign and hs - tyler transcribed wrong